The objective is not to create artificial boundaries between increasingly interconnected areas of research. It is to give each abstract a clear scientific home while allowing work that crosses methodologies, modalities and applications to be properly identified.

Primary Scientific Themes
01
Technical / Methods

Includes

Studies focused on the development, evaluation, validation, or optimization of imaging and biomarker methods, including tracer development and evaluation; pharmacokinetic and quantitative modeling; methods to improve quantification, accuracy, reproducibility, or harmonization; image acquisition, reconstruction, processing, and analysis methods; development, refinement, or validation of biofluid-based biomarker methods; new technologies and assays; computational and analytical methods; and methodological approaches integrating imaging, biofluid, or other biomarker modalities.

Does not primarily include

Studies in which established imaging, biofluid, or other biomarker methods are principally being used to address a clinical, disease-progression, therapeutic, or neuropathological question rather than to develop, evaluate, or advance the methodology itself.

Is the principal scientific contribution about the method or measurement itself?
02
Clinical

Includes

Studies examining the clinical and biological significance and application of imaging and related biomarkers across the disease continuum, including relationships with cognition, symptoms, diagnosis and clinical phenotype; prognosis and disease progression; risk, resilience, and heterogeneity; longitudinal and multimodal studies; participant characterization and stratification; biomarker relationships across stages of disease; therapeutic response and treatment effects; clinical trials and therapeutic development; and translation of biomarkers into clinical research and practice.

Does not primarily include

Studies whose principal contribution is the technical development, validation, or optimization of an imaging or biofluid biomarker method, tracer, or quantitative approach; or studies in which the principal scientific question concerns the relationship between biomarkers and neuropathologically defined disease or pathology.

Is the principal scientific contribution about what the biomarker tells us about people, disease, progression, treatment, or clinical application?
03
Neuropathology

Includes

Studies in which neuropathology is central to the scientific question, including studies linking imaging (PET, MRI), biofluid (plasma, CSF), clinical, or other biomarker measures with diagnostic neuropathology stages or scores; quantitative neuropathology measures; regional distributions and burdens of neuropathologic lesions; neuropathologic diagnoses; molecular or cellular pathologic findings; and clinicopathologic and biomarker-pathology correlations relevant to Alzheimer’s disease and related disorders. This may also include evaluation of neuropathology methods when used to validate or interpret imaging or biofluid analyses.

Does not primarily include

Studies that use terms such as amyloid, tau, or other pathology to describe findings measured by PET imaging or other biomarkers without substantive neuropathological analysis of brain tissue. Likewise, the use of brain tissue, autopsy material, neuropathology specimens, or pathology-derived samples does not by itself make a study a Neuropathology abstract. Neuropathology must be substantive to the scientific question, validation, endpoint, or interpretation. Studies without such a substantive neuropathologic component—and studies whose principal contribution is otherwise methodological or predominantly clinical—should instead be submitted to the primary theme reflecting the central scientific question.

Is neuropathological analysis of brain tissue, or its relationship to imaging or biofluid findings, substantive to the hypothesis, validation, endpoint, interpretation, or scientific contribution?
Cross-Cutting Areas

Some HAI research naturally spans scientific themes, methodologies and biomarker modalities. These areas are therefore not separate primary themes. Submitters should first select the primary theme that best reflects the principal scientific question or contribution of the abstract and may then identify applicable cross-cutting areas.

Fluid Biomarkers

Applies to

Research involving plasma, CSF, or other biofluid-based biomarkers, including new technologies and assays; methodological development, refinement, validation, and quantification; biological and clinical interpretation; longitudinal applications; and integration with imaging, neuropathology, clinical measures, or other biomarker modalities.

Where does it belong?

A study focused on developing or refining a biofluid method may primarily belong in Technical / Methods. A study using fluid biomarkers to investigate disease progression, prognosis, therapeutic response, or clinical utility may primarily belong in Clinical. A study relating fluid biomarkers to neuropathologically defined disease, staging, or quantitative pathology may primarily belong in Neuropathology.

Key principle: The presence of a fluid biomarker does not determine the primary theme. The principal scientific question does.
AI / Computational Approaches

Applies to

Research using artificial intelligence, machine learning, advanced computational approaches, or data-driven modeling to analyze, integrate, interpret, or predict from imaging, biofluid, clinical, neuropathologic, or multimodal data.

Where does it belong?

Development or validation of the computational methodology itself may primarily belong in Technical / Methods. Application to disease, prognosis, treatment, or other clinical questions may primarily belong in Clinical. Applications principally addressing neuropathologic questions may primarily belong in Neuropathology.

Key principle: The use of AI, machine learning, or computational analysis as a tool does not by itself determine the abstract’s primary theme.
Clinical Trials / Therapeutic Development

Applies to

Research involving therapeutic development and clinical trials, including biomarker-based participant selection or stratification; target engagement; treatment response; safety monitoring; trial endpoints; disease modification; biomarker qualification or validation for therapeutic studies; and imaging or other biomarkers used to inform therapeutic development.

Where does it belong?

Development or validation of a novel quantitative or methodological endpoint may primarily belong in Technical / Methods. Studies principally examining treatment effects, response, participant characteristics, or clinical utility may primarily belong in Clinical. Studies using neuropathology as a central therapeutic or validation endpoint may primarily belong in Neuropathology.

Key principle: A study does not automatically belong in Clinical simply because its data arise from a clinical trial. The principal scientific contribution determines the primary theme.

Still not sure where your abstract belongs?

Is your paper principally about HOW we measure it?
→ Technical / Methods
Is it principally about WHAT it means for people, disease, progression or treatment?
→ Clinical
Is it principally about WHAT neuropathology establishes or explains?
→ Neuropathology
Once you have selected the primary scientific theme, identify any applicable cross-cutting areas.

These themes guide abstract submission, scientific review, and program development for HAI 2027.

Abstract submission opens October 2, 2026
Submission deadline: October 23, 2026
Submit an Abstract — Opens October 2